In a shocking turn of events that has gripped both China and the international community, Hong Tu Nanjing, the man at the center of one of the most scandalous cases in recent memory, has confessed details that no one saw coming. Just 30 minutes ago, according to local sources, Hong Tu Nanjing reportedly admitted to the police that he used all the video recordings he secretly made of his sexual encounters with men—reportedly as far back as 1961 if his bizarre statement is to be believed—for the purpose of personal profit, blackmail, and even twisted fame. The confession, although partially incoherent at times, has sent shockwaves through an already stunned public.
Witnesses at the police station describe Hong Tu Nanjing as appearing exhausted, emotional, and at times even smug about the revelations. According to officers, he claimed that the videos were never meant to be kept private. Instead, he planned to leak them strategically over the years to gain money from certain underground networks and adult sites. Some officials say he also intended to use them to extort or control influential individuals who fell into his trap, creating a web of secrets and manipulation that he believed would keep him powerful.
What makes the confession even more disturbing is the sheer scale of the operation. Earlier reports estimated that Hong Tu Nanjing lured over 1,600 men into his apartment under the guise of being a woman. Many victims were unaware that they were being filmed and even more shocked when clips started appearing in discreet online circles. Some victims bravely came forward to share their stories, showing bruised trust, emotional scars, and fear of social backlash.
Despite the twisted nature of the scandal, some online conspiracy theorists are now speculating that Hong Tu Nanjing may not have acted alone. Rumors suggest that an underground network could have helped him distribute the videos in exchange for a share of the profit. Others believe that he might have used the tapes to curry favor or manipulate certain figures in local communities or entertainment circles. No concrete evidence of co-conspirators has been confirmed, but police say they are widening their investigation and reviewing financial records, communications, and the devices seized from his apartment.
Meanwhile, the confession has caused further uproar among his victims. Many are demanding justice and want the authorities to guarantee that every piece of footage is confiscated, deleted, and never again sees the light of day. Some victims, who initially stayed silent due to shame and stigma, are now banding together online to demand tougher punishment and stronger privacy laws. They argue that Hong Tu Nanjing’s case exposes alarming gaps in privacy protection and the accountability of online platforms that allow such content to spread.
Legal experts in China and abroad are also weighing in, saying this case could set a precedent for stricter regulations against hidden recordings and revenge porn. Some are calling for lifetime imprisonment for those who secretly record and monetize sexual acts without consent. Others point out that the victims’ mental health must be prioritized in the aftermath of such mass exploitation.
Public reaction has been a mixture of disbelief, disgust, and morbid fascination. Social media platforms are flooded with hashtags related to Hong Tu Nanjing, and millions are trying to piece together how one man managed to deceive so many for so long. Old photos, video stills, and screen captures are circulating widely, despite warnings from authorities not to share explicit content.
In his confession, Hong Tu Nanjing also reportedly claimed that he never thought he would be caught because he “trusted people to keep silent out of shame.” He said he felt “invincible” for years and thought that by controlling intimate secrets, he could control people’s lives. But this delusion of power crumbled when brave victims stepped forward and exposed him, risking their own reputations to bring him down.
As of now, Hong Tu Nanjing remains in custody, with investigators questioning him further. His lawyer has declined to comment publicly, citing the sensitivity of the case and the overwhelming amount of digital evidence the police are now sifting through. Experts predict more shocking details may emerge in the coming days as police piece together the true scope of his hidden network and the possible involvement of others.
For the victims and the wider public, the confession is both a grim vindication and a painful reminder of how easily trust can be betrayed. One thing is certain: this scandal has sparked a massive discussion about online safety, the ethics of recording, and the terrifying power of digital blackmail in the modern world. As the story continues to unfold, many are hoping for tough justice—not just for Hong Tu Nanjing, but as a warning to anyone who might dare to exploit the most private moments of unsuspecting victims ever again.
